동성애 반대 글 - 내 생각 역시 자연이치에 벗어나는 짓.

不信者
 
기독교 동성애자가 살인도 할 수 있다는 소리
 이건 성경을 우롱하는 짓이지
 
안산 토막살인사건에는 동성애 살인자가 있다. 아무도 해치지 않는다는 건 거짓말임 
 
동성애 (불신자들) 사회적으로 찬성한다고 해서 나는 동성애자 아님
 ㅡㅡ;;; 착각은 니 자유~
 
불신자보다 더 안 좋은게 포스트모더니즘
 
기독교적 무신론 - 동성애 허용 = 포스트 모더니즘
신은 하나님이 아니다를 믿는 것과 같은 이치 = 이게  불신자라고 하는 것임
不信者는 사탄의 최고 전략
 
 하나님이 누구냐? 정의해 보면 답이 나온다.
신학이고 교리고 나발이고 다 필요없이 이 질문에 답이 있어야 한다.
 
 
http://hei.hankyung.com/news/app/newsview.php?aid=201606022791H

나는 여기 주석 11번에 근거하여 동성애 반대함 
 
https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/%EB%8F%99%EC%84%B1%EC%95%A0%EC%99%80_%EA%B8%B0%EB%8F%85%EA%B5%90

THE NATION

THE NATION; Anti-Gay Backlashes Are on 3 States' Ballots

By TIMOTHY EGAN 

Published: October 4, 1992

 
   
PORTLAND, Ore.—  EVEN though the family values debate has faded from the Presidential campaign, it is in full fire in several states. And when local communities talk about homosexuals, they make Patrick Buchanan sound subtle, leaving behind code words and generalities.

Here in Oregon, printed caricatures of drooling pedophiles have been used to urge people to vote for Ballot Measure 9, which would amend the state constitution to classify homosexuality as "abnormal, wrong, unnatural or perverse." If the measure passes, it will be the government's job to actively discourage homosexuality at all levels of state authority, from zoning commissions to fish and game licensing.

In Colorado, where Amendment 2 would prohibit any community from passing laws protecting homosexuals from discrimination, the rhetoric from people opposing the issue has been just as hot. They have distributed fliers comparing the leader of the conservative group promoting the measure to a Nazi. Will Perkins, a Colorado Springs car dealer who is a chief financial supporter of the measure, is being boycotted. "Don't pay him to hate!" the pamphlets say.

And in Portland, Me., voters will consider an initiative to repeal the city's five-month-old ordinance prohibiting discrimination against homosexuals. A Christian group bills the vote as more crucial than the Presidential election. Jasper Wyman, the executive director of the Christian Civic League, wrote that "This vote on gay rights is the most critically significant moral issue facing Maine people, probably in the history of our state."

The campaigns seem to have three similarities: they originated with Christian groups that say the Bible condemns homosexuality, they play best with middle-of-the-road voters when gay legal protections are represented as "special rights," and fear of the influence that homosexuals may have on children is a theme of the advertising strategy.

If either state measure passes -- and both are given a fair chance -- leaders of the anti-gay rights movement say they will take the campaign to a national level.

After two decades of victories, advocates of gay rights say they may be in for their first major retreat this year. Over the last 20 years, seven states and more than 110 communities have passed laws protecting homosexuals from discrimination.

"What's definitely going on right now is a backlash, and a well-funded one at that," said Gregory King, a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign Fund, the country's largest lesbian and gay political group. "It's coming from bigots posing as religious leaders. These people do not represent mainstream values." Mr. King said the agenda of the anti-gay groups is to raise money based on the emotional pitch of these campaigns and to expand their political influence around the country. Shifting fFrom Abortion

The political rallying cry for some of the anti-gay rights groups used to be abortion. For example, Lon Mabon's Oregon Citizens Alliance has failed repeatedly in attempts to roll back pro-abortion rights in this state. But when the group targeted gay people, as in 1988 with a statewide initiative to repeal a state order protecting homosexuals, it was successful. Pat Robertson's Christian Coalition has also shifted much of its political attention to gay measures this year.

Both liberals and conservatives will vote against gay rights, according to some surveys, because, unlike abortion rights, the concerns of gay people have not yet become mainstream.

The leaders of anti-gay groups say that homosexuals already have the rights guaranteed to every American under the Constitution and that it weakens the definition of a minority to say that someone deserves that legal status because of sexual preference.

"Just because somebody has a proclivity to be something, like an alcoholic for example, doesn't mean we have to give them special protection," said Mr. Mabon, leader of the Oregon Citizens Alliance, which is behind Ballot Measure 9.

Mr. Mabon and other anti-gay leaders admit their measures would in essence legalize discrimination. By forcing the issue, they say they want voters to pass moral judgment one way or the other on homosexuality. Oregon is the most extreme example; even backers of the Colorado initiative have tried to distance themselves from the Oregon campaign.

If someone loses a job or apartment because he or she is homosexual, that judgment is legitimate, say anti-gay leaders. "You can be fired for being fat, skinny, ugly, any reason," said Mr. Perkins, the Colorado car dealer. Maverick Streaks

It may seem unlikely that Oregon, Colorado and Maine -- three states with reputations for backwoodsy tolerance -- have become this year's gay rights battlegrounds, rather than Bible Belt states. But gay rights activists have been relatively ineffective in countering the speed and organizing ability of those who are promoting the initiatives.

And these states also have maverick streaks where the egalitarian ethic reigns. As long as homosexuals can be seen as demanding so-called special rights, they will probably lose at the ballot box, pollsters say.

When the question is whether gay people should be dismissed from a job or kicked out of a home because of sexual preference, a majority answers no. But when the question posed is whether homosexuals should be given legal protection beyond what is already on the books in most states, the majority usually sides against gay rights.

"We can win when we face honestly presented arguments," said Mr. King, the gay rights advocate. "But this whole idea that the right to keep a job or hold onto a home is a special right, is nonsense."

Photo: A Portland, Ore., man who opposes the anti-gay amendment to the state's constitution installing a sign outside his home last week. (Don Ryan for The New York Times)

불신자에게 동성애 허용은 사회적으로 받아들인다고 쳐도  기독교는 동성애 허용은 논란임

​
동성애 자체가 죄라서 하나님 명령 불복종이라는 게 전통적 교리(성경해석)이기 때문임.
 
기독교 무신론은 공산주의에서 태동되서 주의깊게 다뤄야 할 신학 부분도 있다. 
  
어차피 최종 심판은 하나님만의 고유 권한임 - 내가 말할 수 있는 건 여기까지
동성애를 심판하던 용서하던 말던 그건 인간계고 

성경은 인간계가 아닌 신계에서 이뤄질 부분인데 알 수 없다는 것.
 
神界 = 하나님의 의지에 달린 문제라는 거. 
  
모든 인간이 예수를 믿으면 구원 받을 수 있다는 질문에서 나오는 문제들.

동성애는 불신자에게 부분적으로 허용된다. 이게 사회다.

아직 동성에는 한국 법에선 불법이다. 해선 안되는 짓중에 하나다.

​

홍성사, IVP  존 스토트 - 동성애 논쟁 책 에서도 동성애는 종족번식의 자연이치에서 어긋난다고 써져 있다.